Everything starts with an idea. One day your sitting there and BAM! That big light bulb in the head goes off. “Hey I need to find a Web Designer in Santa Clarita” Gee Really? Now here’s the big problem, most people wait till the very last minute.

Gee Maybe I should Search Google for “Web Design Santa Clarita“…

Here’s what I mean, most will wait till the very last minute. So let’s say you’re looking to start a new business in Santa Clarita. First you spend your time trying to find that perfect location, 1 to 2 months, maybe longer. Finally you find that warm and fuzzy spot and think “This is it!” that ah ha moment you have been waiting for.

But you still haven’t searched Google for “Web Design Santa Clarita“

Now you spend all your time building out your location, maybe that takes a good 3 to 4 months, assuming you don’t have to build the building.

But you still haven’t found a “Web Designer In Santa Clarita“.

Wow your new location is getting ready to open up. You’re on fire, your are super excited. This is going to be the best adventure of your life.

Nope still haven’t gotten around to finding a “Web Designer“

Hey, who needs a web site right? It’s just a fad, yes people still think that way. So since you don’t need a website or a web designer in Santa Clarita, let’s start finding a graphic designer. Hey you need a good logo, just in case somebody finds your website that you don’t have, right… Oh wait you need a logo for that business card you’re going to hand out, you know so you can say hey this is what I do. So you run to Google and search “Graphic Design Santa Clarita”

Wow you’re on a role you just found the very best Graphic Designer in Santa Clarita.

Shoot you probably found Will Sherwood of “The Sherwood Group” in Santa Clarita. He’s one of the best I know and Google says he’s the best, so he must be the best, right…

But you still haven’t search for the very best web designer in Santa Clarita.

OK, business is ready to go live, business cards check, sign on business check, ready to do business check, bla bla bla bla… check, check, check…

Wait!

I don’t have a website… Oh OK, it’s time to run to Google and find the best website designers in all of Santa Clarita. So you search Google for “Web Design Santa Clarita” and BAM! There’s Nine Eye Interactive Media. Yes we do build websites and we can do them extremely fast. But the moral of the story is DONT WAIT TILL THE LAST MINUTE!

Article Source: Nine Eye Interactive Media
Article: Web Design in Santa Clarita – Santa Clarita Web Designers
Author: Chaz Key

Web Design in Santa Clarita – Santa Clarita Web Designers

Tags: web designer, santa clarita web design, web design santa clarita, web design, web designers

Actos Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Bladder Cancer Risk

A class action lawsuit (actos lawsuit) has been filed against Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly on behalf of all users of the diabetes drug Actos, seeking financial compensation and medical monitoring as a result of the drug makers’ failure to adequately warn about the risk of bladder cancer from Actos.

The Actos class action lawsuit was filed last month in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on behalf of two users of the drug who developed bladder cancer, and one of their spouses. However, the complaint seeks class certification to include coverage for the millions of individuals who used Actos in the United States since it was introduced in 1999.

Actos (pioglitazone)

Actos (pioglitazone) is a prescription medication approved by the FDA for treatment of Type II diabetes. The drug increases the body’s sensitivity to insulin, and has increased in popularity in recent years, generating an estimated $4.3 billion in sales last year and becoming one of the ten best selling drugs in the United States.

FDA issued warnings

Recently, concerns have surfaced about a potential increased risk of bladder cancer from Actos. In June 2011, the FDA issued warnings indicating that use of Actos for more than one year has been associated with a bladder cancer risk. As a result of the high incidence of cancer identified, French drug regulators forced an Actos recall to be issued in that country, and many have suggested that Actos should be removed from the market in the United States as well.

In recent months, dozens of individuals throughout the United States have filed an Actos bladder cancer lawsuit, alleging that Takeda pharmaceuticals failed to adequately research their medication or warn about the potential risks associated with use.

Lawsuit over Actos filed on September 16

According to allegations raised in the class action lawsuit over Actos filed on September 16, Takeda had a significant financial incentive to suppress, misrepresent and conceal the potential dangers assocaited with Actos to maximize their profits at the expense of the health of patients taking the drug. As a result of the drug maker’s failure to appropriately disclose material information about the known risk of cancer from Actos, the complaint alleges that users did not have adequate information about the risks of using Actos and were therefore unable to avoid exposing themselves to a risk of injury.

“Clearly, the relationship between Actos and bladder cancer has been known, or should have been known, to Defendants,” the class action Actos complaint alleges. “Despite their knowledge, Defendants refused to inform patients, doctors or the medical community about the risks and put their profits before people.”

Plaintiffs indicate that they are bringing the Actos class action to recover money damages, medical monitoring and other relief for all individuals who ingested Actos in the United States or it’s territories since it was introduced in July 1999. Actos was taken by millions of people each week, resulting in a class that could include a millions if the complaint is certified.

U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is expected to decide later this year whether the federal Actos litigation, which currently consists of more than 50 individual lawsuits and this one class action, should be centralized before one judge for pretrial proceedings. If the cases are consolidated, the cases would be managed in a manner similar to how an Actos class action suit would be handled during discovery and pretrial litigation. However, if an Actos settlement or other resolution is not reached, each case would be handled individually for trial.

Article: Actos Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Bladder Cancer Risk
Article Source: BeElected.com
Author: Brown Eyesman

Actos Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Bladder Cancer Risk

Tags; Actos Lawsuit; Actos Cancer; Bladder Cancer; Takeda Pharmaceuticals

Resources; Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Actos Lawsuit;Actos Cancer; Bladder Cancer

And despite years of poor health, his death on Wednesday at the age of 56 prompted a global gasp as many people remembered how much he had done to transform the worlds of computing, music and mobile phones, changing the way people communicate and access information and entertainment.

“The world rarely sees someone who has had the profound impact Steve has had, the effects of which will be felt for many generations to come,” said Microsoft co-founder and long-time rival Bill Gates.

“For those of us lucky enough to get to work with him, it’s been an insanely great honor.”

The founder of Apple Inc died on Wednesday in Palo Alto, surrounded by his family. The circumstances of his passing were unclear, but Jobs has had a long battle with cancer and other health issues.

Jobs’ family thanked many for their prayers during the last year of Steves illness.

A college dropout, Jobs floated through India in search of spiritual guidance prior to founding Apple – a name he suggested to his friend and co-founder Steve Wozniak after a visit to a commune in Oregon he referred to as an “apple orchard.”

With his passion for minimalist design and marketing genius, Jobs changed the course of personal computing during two stints at Apple and then brought a revolution to the mobile market.

The iconic iPod, the iPhone – dubbed the “Jesus phone” for its quasi-religious following – and the iPad are the creation of a man who was known for his near-obsessive control of the product development process.

“Most mere mortals cannot understand a person like Steve Jobs,” said bestselling author and venture capitalist Guy Kawasaki, a former Apple employee, in a recent interview. He considers Jobs “the greatest CEO in the history of man”, adding that he just had “a different operating system.”

Charismatic, visionary, ruthless, perfectionist, dictator – these are some of the words that people have used to describe Jobs, who may have been the biggest dreamer the technology world has ever known, but also was a hard-edged businessman and negotiator through and through.

“Steve was the best of the best. Like Mozart and Picasso, he may never be equaled,” said Marc Andreessen, venture capitalist and co-founder of Netscape Communications.

Microsoft’s Gates had called Jobs the most inspiring person in the tech industry and President Barack Obama held him up as the embodiment of the American Dream.

It’s hard to imagine a bigger success story than Steve Jobs, but rejection, failure and bad fate were part and parcel of who he was. Jobs was given away at birth, driven out of Apple in the mid-80s and struck with cancer when he finally had regained the top of the mountain.

He resigned as CEO of Apple Inc on August 24 – saying he could no longer fulfill the duties – and briefly served as chairman before his death.

Jobs grew up with an adopted family in Silicon Valley, which was turning from orchards to homes for workers at Lockheed and other defense and technology companies.

Electronics friend Bill Fernandez introduced him to boy engineer Wozniak, and the two Steves began a friendship that eventually bred Apple Computer.

“Woz is a brilliant engineer, but he is not really an entrepreneur, and that’s where Jobs came in,” recently remembered Fernandez, who was the first employee at Apple.

Wozniak earlier this year said that his goal was only to design hardware and he had no interest in running Apple.

“Steve Jobs’ role was defined — you’ve got to learn to be an executive in every division of the company so you can be the world’s most important person some day. That was his goal,” joked Wozniak, who is still listed as an employee, even though he has not worked at Apple for years.

AWFUL-TASTING MEDICINE

Jobs created Apple twice – once when he founded it and the second time after a return credited with saving the company, which now vies with Exxon Mobil as the most valuable publicly traded corporation in the United States.

Every day to him was “a new adventure in the company,” Jay Elliot, a former senior vice president at Apple who worked very closely with Jobs in the eighties, said earlier this year, adding that he was “almost like a child” when it came to his inquisitiveness.

He was highly intolerant of company politics and bureaucracy, Elliot noted.

But the inspiring Jobs came with a lot of hard edges, oftentimes alienating colleagues and early investors with his my-way-or-the-highway dictums and plans that were generally ahead of their time.

Elliot was a witness to the acrimony between Jobs and former Apple Chief Executive John Sculley who often clashed on ideas, products and the direction of the company.

The dispute came to a head at Apple’s first major sales meeting in Hawaii in 1985 where the two “just blew up against each other,” Elliot said.

Jobs left soon after, saying he was fired.

“It was awful-tasting medicine, but I guess the patient needed it. Sometimes life’s gonna hit you in the head with a brick. Don’t lose faith,” Jobs told a Stanford graduating class in 2005.

He returned to Apple about a decade after he left, working as a consultant. Soon he was running it, in what has been called Jobs’ second act.

Jobs reinvented the technology world four or five times, first with the Apple II, a beautiful personal computer in the 1970s; then in the 1980s with the Macintosh, driven by a mouse and presenting a clean screen that made computing inviting; the ubiquitous iPod debuted in 2001, the iPhone in 2007 and in 2010 the iPad, which a year after it was introduced outsold the Mac.

LESS IS MORE

How did he do it? Design fans, Apple employees and Jobs acquaintances credit a natural design-sense drive to simplify. Jobs’ return to Apple was a study in reduction.

Ed Niehaus, who was wooed and hired by Jobs to do public relations for resurgent Apple, remembers an elevator ride that everyone in Silicon Valley has heard of, but seemed more myth than reality. It was soon after Jobs’ triumphant return and he was axing product plans — and people.

Niehaus recalled: “I once rode down an elevator, not that many floors. We got in the elevator and the next floor a young woman got in, and I could see her go, ‘oops, wrong elevator.’ And Steve said, ‘Hi, who are you?’ and introduces himself to her – ‘I’m Steve Jobs’ and turned on the charm and said, ‘What do you do?’ and all this sort of thing. And the door of the elevator opens at the bottom, and he says, ‘We are not going to need you.’ And we walk away.”

Apple was bloated, Niehaus added, and Jobs was bringing back simplicity and focus.

“He always believed the most important decisions you make are not the things you do – but the things that you decide not to do. He’s a minimalist,” former CEO Sculley – who was recruited by Jobs, watched him build the Mac, and then helped throw out the Apple founder in a boardroom battle – told the CultofMac news website in 2010.

A few steps in the Apple design process have leaked out over the years, despite the obsessive secrecy that is part of the company culture. An Apple engineer outlined a long development process at a conference blogged by Businessweek in 2008.

A new product or feature begins with 10 ideas — good ideas, no also-rans, which are presented as “pixel-perfect” mockups. Apple culls the 10 to three, which are tried out for months more, before a final star is chosen.

Meanwhile, the design team meets for two types of weekly meetings — one to brainstorm with no limits, and one to focus on getting the product out the door, Business Week described.

When Steve Jobs weighed in, it was with a simple set of verdicts: “insanely great,” “really, really really great,” and “shit,”, Niehaus recalled.

“Basically Steve tells you exactly what he wants and you just go build it,” said one former iPhone engineer, who declined to give his name.

He remembers working on one project for two months. “Steve said ‘What is this shit? Why are you wasting my time?’” he recalled.

Being chewed up and spat out by Jobs is an experience most Apple employees who have come in contact with Jobs can relate to. And Jobs was known to like people who stood up to him.

“I never asked you to start, so why should I ask you to stop?” Jobs told another former Apple employee, who wanted to know whether he should continue to work on a project that was being questioned by the forceful CEO.

Jobs liked to push. From the very start, people told tales of him putting his – often dirty – feet on the table in meetings. Others tell of Jobs putting down their company, making them defend themselves in interviews.

“He was clearly looking for someone who could stand up to him,” said another former member of the top team. He remembers Jobs and Tim Cook, who is taking over as CEO, as the “metronome” of the company, with vastly different personal styles and exactly the same “insane” attention to detail.

Jobs, in fact, reveled in details, many a time irking everyone around him with his obsessiveness.

Apple’s first CEO Michael Scott has said that Jobs spent weeks contemplating how rounded the edges of the Apple II case should be.

“He put white earbuds in the ears of everyone on the planet, and shut us all in to our own little pods of experience,” said Niehaus, who is in awe of Jobs’ taste and talent.

Jobs, given a Gulfstream jet by his appreciative board, probably didn’t fly commercial in years, and anyone who sits down with an iPod next to someone they don’t want to acknowledge gets a little bit of that experience.

He understood envy “as well as anybody on the planet” and carried it around with him, triple parking his car because he could, said Niehaus, adding that part of what he sold was envy.

THE REAL STEVE JOBS

Even Jobs’ appearance simplified over the years. When he returned to Apple after his decade away, he wore fancy white shirts and vests and even a pin stripe suit to introduce new products.

The black mock turtleneck and jeans that became the defining Jobs outfit showed up at more comfortable settings, when Jobs wooed developers, in the late 1990s. But he pulled the iPod out of a jeans pocket to introduce the music player in 2001. From then on, he barely seemed to take off the outfit.

The jeans and running shoes flashed under his academic gown when he gave the Stanford commencement speech in 2005, and he wore a black mock turtleneck sitting next to President Obama at a 2011 dinner with Silicon Valley titans. On Obama’s other side was Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, who wore a jacket to the event.

Jobs himself described his world as very simple.

“For the past 33 years I have looked in the mirror every morning and asked myself, ‘if today were the last day of my life, would I want to do what I am about to do today?’ And whenever the answer has been ‘no’ for too many days in a row, I know I need to change something,” he told Stanford University students in the soul-baring commencement address.

“Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart,” he said.

That kind of earnest, almost naive hope, combined with ruthless dismissal of whatever missed his lofty standards, were a potent mix for those around him.

His approval was “an addictive drug,” said Niehaus. “I think that most people would knock themselves out to have that experience again, once they’ve had it. It’s that defining. It is a really tremendous experience.”

APPLE 3.0

Jobs had been on leave three times since 2004, and he clearly thought about an Apple without him. Jobs had a liver transplant and a rare form of pancreatic cancer.

His own mortality was a major driver in his life and work.

“Remembering that I’ll be dead soon is the most important tool I’ve ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life,” Jobs said in the commencement speech. “Because almost everything — all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure — these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important.”

Jobs and the Apple board had a succession plan — put Cook in charge — and he has left a well-respected team. Jobs put extraordinary effort into finding people who he said are 10, 20, 50 times better than average, he told Time magazine, adding that there were no prima donnas when great people got together.

“Having a close circle of people was really important to him,” Elliot said.

Many Apple watchers and investors say that the company has a deep bench, led by Cook. But for others, that just doesn’t ring true.

The former engineer whose months of works was dismissed by Jobs with a single curse doesn’t see much strength in the ranks, saying that it was always a case of “Steve is the visionary,” and if something happened it was always a case of “Let’s ask Steve”.

Apple itself marked the death of Jobs by placing a simple black-and-white picture of the founder on the front page of its Web site, with his name and the dates 1955-2011.

Steve Jobs rest in peace. You were an innovator and a brilliant marketer. You will be missed. Thank You for everything.

Your admire,
Chaz Key

Article: Steve Jobs “may never be equaled”

Article Source: Reuters

Author: Poornima Gupta and Peter Henderson

Steve Jobs “may never be equaled”

I think it is ridiculous that an employer can demand their employees to work overtime hours. I do however feel employers deserve to know why an employee is unable or refuses to work overtime. There may be a situation where the client has children and no sitter, or family issues keeping her from being able to switch their schedule and work the overtime. Limiting bathroom breaks is ridiculous beyond belief. There are many people who have health issues that may need to go more often than others.

I had a situation before this where I was terminated because of attendance. Mind you I had not had any warning that my attendance had been in question. I had gotten sick and had a Dr’s note stating that I was not allowed to return to work for 48 hours. The day I came back to work was fine. The next day they terminated me saying my attendance was unacceptable. When I filed for unemployment I was granted because I had a note stating it was not safe for others for me to return to work. Many places I have worked at or had friends work at required a 24 to 48 hour notice for their employees to call in sick. Who knows 24 hours ahead of time that they will be sick??

Employers are out of control and employees are getting fed up with it and this makes for more people in the unemployment line. Employers need to be held responsible for the way they treat their employees or things are going to get worse.

Article: Employers Just Don’t Care

Article Source: Business Actuality

Of 150 business owners surveyed, 14 percent said they are optimistic about their company’s prospects for the next six months. The results are a sharp drop from the 23 percent who reported feeling optimistic during a survey in the spring.

Pessimism was also on the rise, with 53 percent of participants interviewed between July 26 and Sept. 12 saying they felt pessimistic about the local economy, compared with 39 percent in the spring. But the level of negative sentiment was an improvement over results released in October 2010, when 61 percent reported feeling pessimistic about the local economy.

“As owners across all industries report weak sales as their top challenge, more plan to raise selling prices to preserve profit margins in the face of widespread higher nonlabor and health care costs,” PNC said. “These findings support our forecast that the U.S. economic and jobs recovery will persist, and the slow pace of growth will be insufficient to make much progress in lowering Chicago’s high unemployment rate in the coming year.”

Mary Wave, co-owner of Room with a View Inc., an interior design firm in Park Ridge, said she’s picked up some new business, as some customers have opted to spruce up their homes rather than go on vacation. She’s adapted to her clients’ thriftier ways by looking for deals at garage sales and even redoing an old headboard she found on the street. But business is nowhere near prerecession levels, prompting Wave to start making jewelry and to look for part-time employment.

“If you were even slightly living above your means, you got bit,” said Wave, who saw neighbors’ homes fall into foreclosure. “I don’t feel like I did that, but it’s been three years of very reduced income, and I have to figure something else out.”

The PNC survey showed that 16 percent of local business owners expect to hire full-time employees during the next six months, nearly unchanged from the survey in the spring. Another 8 percent were planning to reduce full-time staff, a figure also unchanged from the spring. PNC said weak sales were the primary challenge cited by survey participants. As a result, only 17 percent of business owners said significant tax incentives would revive their hiring plans.

Results also revealed that 38 percent of local business owners plan to raise their prices. Of that group, 92 percent said they are doing so “to avoid a profit squeeze from higher costs.”

Meanwhile, 89 percent of local business owners said they will “probably or definitely” not take out a loan in the next six months, up from 79 percent in the spring. However, 56 percent said they plan on capital spending in the next six months, with technology equipment as a priority.

Article: Business owners say they’re less optimistic
Article Source: Chicago Tribune
Author: Wailin Wong

Business owners say they’re less optimistic

The bill, while similar to one moving through the Senate, would allow more freedom to five Gulf Coast states affected by last year’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill to spend millions of dollars in BP fines headed their way, said Rep. Jeff Miller.

“It would give local governments more say in how and where the money is spent,” said Miller, the Republican from Chumuckla who represents Florida’s 1st Congressional District. “We believe that way the money will be spent more efficiently on more appropriate projects.”

Specifically, Miller said the House bill, unveiled at a news conference in Washington on Wednesday, is designed to limit the power of the federal government to dictate how the BP dollars are spent.

“It has provisions that provide more flexibility to spend the money on economic development instead of restricting it to environmental projects,” Miller said. “The biggest objection (to the Senate bill) for the House sponsors is that there’s not enough to be done to help the economy.”

The RESTORE the Gulf Coast Act bills in both chambers call for 80 percent of BP’s fines collected under the Clean Water Act to be dedicated to the restoration of the Gulf Coast ecosystem and the economies of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas.

Rep. Steve Southerland, who represents Florida’s 2nd District, said the House’s version of the RESTORE Act could help soften the “historic environmental and economic” blow to the Gulf region.

“It is my hope that we can help accelerate the recovery of our coastal communities by directing Clean Water Act funds directly to the areas most critically impacted by the accident,” said Southerland, R-Panama City.

Southerland said the bill will not only address the environmental impact to the region, but also the economic impact to the counties along the Gulf directly impacted by the Deepwater Horizon spill in April 2010.

“Some of the funds will go to find out what impact the spill had on our fisheries,” he said.

35 percent

Under provisions of the House bill, 35 percent of the funds would be divided among the five Gulf states.

The bill also would make 30 percent of the money received available for “development and implementation of a comprehensive restoration plan,” according to a news release issued Wednesday.

The bill envisions the plan to be formulated and money allocated by a council composed of federal and state officials.

It calls for another 30 percent of funds to be allocated through an “impact driven formula” and disbursed “according to plans submitted by the Gulf Coast states and approved by the council.”

The final 5 percent of the funds would go toward establishing an endowment and centers of excellence to advance science and technology in the Gulf region.

Miller said last week that he wasn’t sure the Senate bill, which has passed out of one committee, would get anywhere in a chamber clogged by partisan politics. He repeated that opinion Wednesday.

“I don’t know if they could pass a resolution on Mother’s Day right now,” he said.

Miller said the House version “has a better chance of passing the House than the Senate bill would” because of the economic provisions included.

Under legislation sponsored by state Sen. Don Gaetz, 75 percent of whatever of BP’s fines that make it to Florida will go Escambia, Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, Gulf, Wakulla and Franklin counties.

It will be divided among the counties using a formula established by a recently formed regional coalition.

Article: Northwest Florida’s Area congressmen sign on to RESTORE Act
Article Source: News Herald
Author: TOM McLAUGHLIN

Northwest Florida’s Area congressmen sign on to RESTORE Act

BP has won another round in its ongoing feud with a shareholder of a Russian subsidiary as a Siberian court overturned a ruling related to searches of the company’s office in Moscow earlier this year.

The Arbitration Court in the city of Omsk found in favour of the UK supermajor in its appeal against a July ruling in a separate Russian court which allowed bailiffs to descend on the offices of BP Exploration Operating Company (BP EOC) on 31 August.

Monday’s ruling by the Omsk court overturns the 19 July ruling in Tyumen in favour of a minority shareholder in TNK-BP, the oil giant’s joint venture in Russia, even though that search order had itself been effectively quashed by the Tyumen court in mid September.

BP EOC wrote in a statement on Monday that it “believes that there was no merit to the [19 July] order of Judge Loskutov” as, amongst other reasons, “the claim to secure evidence from BP EOC should not have been reviewed by the Arbitration Court of Tyumen region since it falls under another court’s jurisdiction, namely the Moscow Arbitration Court”.

Bailiffs descended on the offices of BP EOC on 31 August, turfing staff out and occupying the building for two whole days. Although they did not take any documents away with them they sealed documents for later examination.

The raid was directly related to a case brought against BP in Tyumen by a minority shareholder of its joint venture in the country, TNK-BP, who was aggrieved by the collapse of BP’s $16 billion deal with Rosneft in May.

Monday’s ruling in favour of BP is another blow to TNK-BP minority shareholder Andrei Prokhorov who is looking to sue the supermajor for $4.9 billion over alleged losses suffered by the joint venture in the wake of the failed deal with Rosneft.

BP has consistently denied Prokhorov’s claims, saying “there were in fact no damages in the form of lost profits” for TNK-BP as the latter “was not considered as a possible member of the strategic partnership with Rosneft and could not become a partner ‘due to the lack of required competence’, as has frequently been stated by Rosneft.”

BP lashed the 19 July ruling further on Monday by claiming: “The judge accepted a claim from a person who was not entitled to request the securing of evidence prior to a lawsuit since A Prokhorov did not furnish proof that he or other claimants owned at least 1% of TNK-BP Holding shares, which is a prerequisite to file any lawsuit against members of the board of directors.”

The statement argued further: “The ruling was upheld despite the lack of proof of any need to secure the evidence in question. BP EOC believes that A Prokhorov did not provide justified proof that there is any threat of information loss or concealment.”

In mid September an arbitration court in Tyumen cancelled an order to search the Moscow premises of BP EOC after appeals were made by both the BP offshoot and Rosneft. That left the 19 July ruling still standing, however, which BP appealed, leading to Monday’s ruling.

Lawyers acting for TNK-BP told Upstream last month that they would appeal the mid-September Tyumen ruling but a spokesperson for the firm would not make any comment regarding Monday’s development in Omsk.

Article: BP EOC: BP in Russian office raid victory
Article Source: UP Stream Online
Author: Eoin O’Cinneide

BP EOC: BP in Russian office raid victory